Maya's New Husband

Book Review: Maya's new husband 

I received this book as part of an online competition almost a year ago on “For Writers By Authors” Facebook Group (Amazing Group By the way!!). I never intended to read it, not because of the book, but me being a lazy reader and thank god that I didn’t read it any earlier as if I would have read it

1. I would not have glued to the book for almost two days. Between dinner, lunches and also thinking about the book in bed during various positions – you can imagine the repercussions of the last one

2. I would not have missed two meetings and sat for long minutes (stealing minutes wherever and whenever I could) in office toilet reading the book – wonder what my colleagues were thinking.

3. I would not have yelled in between (Part 2)…fuck this shit is super good

4. I would not have skipped chapters just to see what happened …this is the first time I did that and mind me I have read reasonably many good international thrillers.

Now to the review …

But …before we start – I am not a professional reviewer as of yet(at least!) and with one published book so far in my kitty still exploring Authoring and hence all the books I read now, I read it with an Author lens, to see what I can learn from it, so my analysis probably will be a bit different.

Okay now to the review …

  

Book starts with a cliché prologue, also the word Cliché is in editor’s note, probably Neil’s favourite word. Neil mentions three part series (which is good) but I thought the second part was call “The birth of the dead"; the name is different in the book.

I felt the flip between Maya’s life, also Aradhana (there were again cliché of old age – watching TV (National debate), nothing new have seen, read and debated many times) and Namrta’s character building was slow (does not hold interest to the fullest, more telling in between conversations!) compared with the torture and cannibalism scenes of the unknown man – here the scenes are more visual and lot of showing. This is the part which keeps the interest going for the book. There is though no mention of surroundings even from the victim POV.

The town is “Haridwar”, not “Hardwar” as mentioned in the book – probably intentionally.

One thing which I observed is the use of filler – “Explanation of Human Heart” and one more later in the book (which I can’t remember now!), which is really good and can be used effectively, it’s like the author is now interacting directly with the readers moving away a bit from the story. I will definitely use this concept in my next.

At this point I was thinking does cannibalism really happens? And I realized that I am on chapter 3. I was surprised and surely I have read more than that, I looked back and saw the unique way the numbering was done and then while doing so I read the chapter names/titles. This is the thing which kept me going till the end. The titles are amazing and it’s also amazing how they were used and referred in the chapters/story/sentences, which made me think – why do some books have titles and some not? What does putting or not putting a title tell about the Author? Is it always good to keep title? Something to think for my next book.

Some confusion, the unknown man eats human flesh once a week and he have had this place from last two years (that’s what he says in the book) and yet the count is very less – I think in chapter 5.

The loosing hearts chapter beautifully writes the transformation in behaviour from disliking someone to falling in love and the title is as apt

By this time; I had this thought at back, front and middle of my mind – this book is too restrictive. It tells all, its takes me to a path as a reader where I can find all the details. I don’t have to look outside its parameters. Everything, every detail, which my mind could think for was there, laid out like a path and I just have to relax, read and follow. I didn’t like it. I like to read books which leaves few things for the readers to imagine and explore. Otherwise what is the fun in reading? No doubt Neil being a teacher in his past life knows how to control his class J

(By the way this is appreciation as well as complain)

Some scenes are really strong and the visuals leave a mark; two examples are

1. Bhaskar ejaculating his fluids on Maya’s picture

2. Maya touching Bhaskar’s missing toe.

Do corn really grow near Haridwar / Hardwar? Couldn’t find any reference on internet; but I am sure Neil has done is due research.

At quite a few places, I found that the same sentences is written more than once very near to each other; which is repetitive.

I found that this book can be a good reference to someone who want to use big and fancy words to describe emotions. At some places it does feel that the word is placed out of the way.

Probably too early; but still this is where I got this emotion about the book – the story is predictable; I knew Bhaskar killed Samar on Maya’s wedding day in discussion with Namrata. Even the other parts are predictable, which is bit of a low point, I guess. But it one of those things, where you know the story, still it is interesting to read.  

Part one is not a rapid page turner; but nevertheless with an apt ending and also from POV perspective; Bhaskar emotions are well hidden with a purpose, I guess, which is good as well. But the question which I was juggling with was that – does this part wake your inner animal?

Now coming to Part II …

This is where the game begins. This is no doubt the best part of the book and I felt after a long time what does it mean to feel “sitting on the edge”. I always feel that when you say “Ah! This is the way it should have gone! What would have happened if this would have happened”, this is where I feel a book and characters have made their mark and part two is where I felt it, but I do hate the collateral damage (Padma).

Amazing thriller sequence; nerve breaking writing. Horrible (Amazing) absolutely horrible (Amazing). This is where I was shouting on top of my voice that this shit is really really really good and glad that I read the book :)

Part III - Bhaskar's past is bit of a lull before the storm, a filler, which pushes the interest away from the book ... like the first part 

Part IV

Chapter 21 – “tell her that day” ...it should be “tell her that yesterday” as it was only “Yesterday” the wedding day was.

I felt that Maya going in the garage was very flat and too long too (The kind of excitement does not stay which got created in part 2); ending is bit filmy; but who is to complaining – the book is going for a movie release and it does fit well.

One more question – Maya was not shown as a very strong lady (apart from not crying); but I didn’t understand why she did not raise any questions during their one month of marriage – not even one. Why did she become so submissive?  They had love marriage after all.

Last one promise – I assumed that this was a horror book– like ghosts and all; but I found a thriller not too scary (to my likesJ), maybe my expectation were huge reading all the discussions in the group.

In the end; it is a well written book, where some parts and narrations will leave you jumping from your seats. I wish Neil all the luck for his future endeavours and

Finally

Will I read the Author again – YES

Will I read this book again – YES (for reference)

Will I recommend the book to others – YES

Will I store the book in my “Library” – Probably Not 

Vikkas Arun Pareek 

Author of - Voices of the Silent Creek